If you'd like to create an op that isn't covered by the existing TensorFlow library, we recommend that you first try writing the op in Python as a composition of existing Python ops or functions. If that isn't possible, you can create a custom C++ op. There are several reasons why you might want to create a custom C++ op:
 It's not easy or possible to express your operation as a composition of existing ops.
 It's not efficient to express your operation as a composition of existing primitives.
 You want to handfuse a composition of primitives that a future compiler would find difficult fusing.
For example, imagine you want to implement something like "median pooling", similar to the "MaxPool" operator, but computing medians over sliding windows instead of maximum values. Doing this using a composition of operations may be possible (e.g., using ExtractImagePatches and TopK), but may not be as performance or memoryefficient as a native operation where you can do something more clever in a single, fused operation. As always, it is typically first worth trying to express what you want using operator composition, only choosing to add a new operation if that proves to be difficult or inefficient.
To incorporate your custom op you'll need to:
 Register the new op in a C++ file. Op registration defines an interface (specification) for the op's functionality, which is independent of the op's implementation. For example, op registration defines the op's name and the op's inputs and outputs. It also defines the shape function that is used for tensor shape inference.
 Implement the op in C++. The implementation of an op is known as a kernel, and it is the concrete implementation of the specification you registered in Step 1. There can be multiple kernels for different input / output types or architectures (for example, CPUs, GPUs).
 Create a Python wrapper (optional). This wrapper is the public API that's used to create the op in Python. A default wrapper is generated from the op registration, which can be used directly or added to.
 Write a function to compute gradients for the op (optional).
 Test the op. We usually do this in Python for convenience, but you can also
test the op in C++. If you define gradients, you can verify them with the
Python gradient checker.
See
relu_op_test.py
as an example that tests the forward functions of Relulike operators and their gradients.
PREREQUISITES:
 Some familiarity with C++.
 Must have installed the TensorFlow binary, or must have downloaded TensorFlow source, and be able to build it.
Define the op's interface
You define the interface of an op by registering it with the TensorFlow system. In the registration, you specify the name of your op, its inputs (types and names) and outputs (types and names), as well as docstrings and any attrs the op might require.
To see how this works, suppose you'd like to create an op that takes a tensor of
int32
s and outputs a copy of the tensor, with all but the first element set to
zero. To do this, create a file named zero_out.cc
. Then add a call to the
REGISTER_OP
macro that defines the interface for your op:
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/shape_inference.h"
using namespace tensorflow;
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Input("to_zero: int32")
.Output("zeroed: int32")
.SetShapeFn([](::tensorflow::shape_inference::InferenceContext* c) {
c>set_output(0, c>input(0));
return Status::OK();
});
This ZeroOut
op takes one tensor to_zero
of 32bit integers as input, and
outputs a tensor zeroed
of 32bit integers. The op also uses a shape function
to ensure that the output tensor is the same shape as the input tensor. For
example, if the input is a tensor of shape [10, 20], then this shape function
specifies that the output shape is also [10, 20].
A note on naming: The op name must be in CamelCase and it must be unique among all other ops that are registered in the binary.
Implement the kernel for the op
After you define the interface, provide one or more implementations of the op.
To create one of these kernels, create a class that extends OpKernel
and
overrides the Compute
method. The Compute
method provides one context
argument of type OpKernelContext*
, from which you can access useful things
like the input and output tensors.
Add your kernel to the file you created above. The kernel might look something like this:
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h"
using namespace tensorflow;
class ZeroOutOp : public OpKernel {
public:
explicit ZeroOutOp(OpKernelConstruction* context) : OpKernel(context) {}
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// Grab the input tensor
const Tensor& input_tensor = context>input(0);
auto input = input_tensor.flat<int32>();
// Create an output tensor
Tensor* output_tensor = NULL;
OP_REQUIRES_OK(context, context>allocate_output(0, input_tensor.shape(),
&output_tensor));
auto output_flat = output_tensor>flat<int32>();
// Set all but the first element of the output tensor to 0.
const int N = input.size();
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++) {
output_flat(i) = 0;
}
// Preserve the first input value if possible.
if (N > 0) output_flat(0) = input(0);
}
};
After implementing your kernel, you register it with the TensorFlow system. In the registration, you specify different constraints under which this kernel will run. For example, you might have one kernel made for CPUs, and a separate one for GPUs.
To do this for the ZeroOut
op, add the following to zero_out.cc
:
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER(Name("ZeroOut").Device(DEVICE_CPU), ZeroOutOp);
Important: Instances of your OpKernel may be accessed concurrently. Your
Compute
method must be threadsafe. Guard any access to class members with a mutex. Or better yet, don't share state via class members! Consider using aResourceMgr
to keep track of op state.
Multithreaded CPU kernels
To write a multithreaded CPU kernel, the Shard function in
work_sharder.h
can be used. This function shards a computation function across the
threads configured to be used for intraop threading (see
intra_op_parallelism_threads in
config.proto
).
GPU kernels
A GPU kernel is implemented in two parts: the OpKernel and the CUDA kernel and its launch code.
Sometimes the OpKernel implementation is common between a CPU and GPU kernel, such as around inspecting inputs and allocating outputs. In that case, a suggested implementation is to:
 Define the OpKernel templated on the Device and the primitive type of the tensor.
 To do the actual computation of the output, the Compute function calls a templated functor struct.
 The specialization of that functor for the CPUDevice is defined in the same file, but the specialization for the GPUDevice is defined in a .cu.cc file, since it will be compiled with the CUDA compiler.
Here is an example implementation.
// kernel_example.h
#ifndef KERNEL_EXAMPLE_H_
#define KERNEL_EXAMPLE_H_
template <typename Device, typename T>
struct ExampleFunctor {
void operator()(const Device& d, int size, const T* in, T* out);
};
#if GOOGLE_CUDA
// Partially specialize functor for GpuDevice.
template <typename Eigen::GpuDevice, typename T>
struct ExampleFunctor {
void operator()(const Eigen::GpuDevice& d, int size, const T* in, T* out);
};
#endif
#endif KERNEL_EXAMPLE_H_
// kernel_example.cc
#include "example.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h"
using namespace tensorflow;
using CPUDevice = Eigen::ThreadPoolDevice;
using GPUDevice = Eigen::GpuDevice;
// CPU specialization of actual computation.
template <typename T>
struct ExampleFunctor<CPUDevice, T> {
void operator()(const CPUDevice& d, int size, const T* in, T* out) {
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
out[i] = 2 * in[i];
}
}
};
// OpKernel definition.
// template parameter <T> is the datatype of the tensors.
template <typename Device, typename T>
class ExampleOp : public OpKernel {
public:
explicit ExampleOp(OpKernelConstruction* context) : OpKernel(context) {}
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// Grab the input tensor
const Tensor& input_tensor = context>input(0);
// Create an output tensor
Tensor* output_tensor = NULL;
OP_REQUIRES_OK(context, context>allocate_output(0, input_tensor.shape(),
&output_tensor));
// Do the computation.
OP_REQUIRES(context, input_tensor.NumElements() <= tensorflow::kint32max,
errors::InvalidArgument("Too many elements in tensor"));
ExampleFunctor<Device, T>()(
context>eigen_device<Device>(),
static_cast<int>(input_tensor.NumElements()),
input_tensor.flat<T>().data(),
output_tensor>flat<T>().data());
}
};
// Register the CPU kernels.
#define REGISTER_CPU(T) \
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER( \
Name("Example").Device(DEVICE_CPU).TypeConstraint<T>("T"), \
ExampleOp<CPUDevice, T>);
REGISTER_CPU(float);
REGISTER_CPU(int32);
// Register the GPU kernels.
#ifdef GOOGLE_CUDA
#define REGISTER_GPU(T) \
/* Declare explicit instantiations in kernel_example.cu.cc. */ \
extern template ExampleFunctor<GPUDevice, float>; \
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER( \
Name("Example").Device(DEVICE_GPU).TypeConstraint<T>("T"), \
ExampleOp<GPUDevice, T>);
REGISTER_GPU(float);
REGISTER_GPU(int32);
#endif // GOOGLE_CUDA
// kernel_example.cu.cc
#ifdef GOOGLE_CUDA
#define EIGEN_USE_GPU
#include "example.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/util/cuda_kernel_helper.h"
using namespace tensorflow;
using GPUDevice = Eigen::GpuDevice;
// Define the CUDA kernel.
template <typename T>
__global__ void ExampleCudaKernel(const int size, const T* in, T* out) {
for (int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x; i < size;
i += blockDim.x * gridDim.x) {
out[i] = 2 * ldg(in + i);
}
}
// Define the GPU implementation that launches the CUDA kernel.
template <typename T>
void ExampleFunctor<GPUDevice, T>::operator()(
const GPUDevice& d, int size, const T* in, T* out) {
// Launch the cuda kernel.
//
// See core/util/cuda_kernel_helper.h for example of computing
// block count and thread_per_block count.
int block_count = 1024;
int thread_per_block = 20;
ExampleCudaKernel<T>
<<<block_count, thread_per_block, 0, d.stream()>>>(size, in, out);
}
// Explicitly instantiate functors for the types of OpKernels registered.
template struct ExampleFunctor<GPUDevice, float>;
template struct ExampleFunctor<GPUDevice, int32>;
#endif // GOOGLE_CUDA
Build the op library
Compile the op using your system compiler (TensorFlow binary installation)
You should be able to compile zero_out.cc
with a C++
compiler such as g++
or clang
available on your system. The binary PIP package installs the header
files and the library that you need to compile your op in locations that are
system specific. However, the TensorFlow python library provides the
get_include
function to get the header directory, and the get_lib
directory
has a shared object to link against.
Here are the outputs of these functions on an Ubuntu machine.
$ python
>>> import tensorflow as tf
>>> tf.sysconfig.get_include()
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/tensorflow/include'
>>> tf.sysconfig.get_lib()
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/tensorflow'
Assuming you have g++
installed, here is the sequence of commands you can use
to compile your op into a dynamic library.
TF_INC=$(python c 'import tensorflow as tf; print(tf.sysconfig.get_include())')
TF_LIB=$(python c 'import tensorflow as tf; print(tf.sysconfig.get_lib())')
g++ std=c++11 shared zero_out.cc o zero_out.so fPIC I$TF_INC I$TF_INC/external/nsync/public L$TF_LIB ltensorflow_framework O2
On Mac OS X, the additional flag "undefined dynamic_lookup" is required when
building the .so
file.
Note on
gcc
version>=5
: gcc uses the new C++ ABI since version5
. The binary pip packages available on the TensorFlow website are built withgcc4
that uses the older ABI. If you compile your op library withgcc>=5
, addD_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0
to the command line to make the library compatible with the older abi. Furthermore if you are using TensorFlow package created from source remember to addcxxopt="D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0"
as bazel command to compile the Python package.
Compile the op using bazel (TensorFlow source installation)
If you have TensorFlow sources installed, you can make use of TensorFlow's build
system to compile your op. Place a BUILD file with following Bazel build rule in
the tensorflow/core/user_ops
directory.
load("//tensorflow:tensorflow.bzl", "tf_custom_op_library")
tf_custom_op_library(
name = "zero_out.so",
srcs = ["zero_out.cc"],
)
Run the following command to build zero_out.so
.
$ bazel build config opt //tensorflow/core/user_ops:zero_out.so
Note: Although you can create a shared library (a
.so
file) with the standardcc_library
rule, we strongly recommend that you use thetf_custom_op_library
macro. It adds some required dependencies, and performs checks to ensure that the shared library is compatible with TensorFlow's plugin loading mechanism.
Use the op in Python
TensorFlow Python API provides the
tf.load_op_library
function to
load the dynamic library and register the op with the TensorFlow
framework. load_op_library
returns a Python module that contains the Python
wrappers for the op and the kernel. Thus, once you have built the op, you can
do the following to run it from Python:
import tensorflow as tf
zero_out_module = tf.load_op_library('./zero_out.so')
with tf.Session(''):
zero_out_module.zero_out([[1, 2], [3, 4]]).eval()
# Prints
array([[1, 0], [0, 0]], dtype=int32)
Keep in mind, the generated function will be given a snake_case name (to comply
with PEP8). So, if your op is
named ZeroOut
in the C++ files, the python function will be called zero_out
.
To make the op available as a regular function import
able from a Python
module, it maybe useful to have the load_op_library
call in a Python source
file as follows:
import tensorflow as tf
zero_out_module = tf.load_op_library('./zero_out.so')
zero_out = zero_out_module.zero_out
Verify that the op works
A good way to verify that you've successfully implemented your op is to write a
test for it. Create the file
zero_out_op_test.py
with the contents:
import tensorflow as tf
class ZeroOutTest(tf.test.TestCase):
def testZeroOut(self):
zero_out_module = tf.load_op_library('./zero_out.so')
with self.test_session():
result = zero_out_module.zero_out([5, 4, 3, 2, 1])
self.assertAllEqual(result.eval(), [5, 0, 0, 0, 0])
if __name__ == "__main__":
tf.test.main()
Then run your test (assuming you have tensorflow installed):
$ python zero_out_op_test.py
Building advanced features into your op
Now that you know how to build a basic (and somewhat restricted) op and implementation, we'll look at some of the more complicated things you will typically need to build into your op. This includes:
 Conditional checks and validation
 Op registration
 GPU support
 Implement the gradient in Python
 Shape functions in C++
Conditional checks and validation
The example above assumed that the op applied to a tensor of any shape. What if it only applied to vectors? That means adding a check to the above OpKernel implementation.
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// Grab the input tensor
const Tensor& input_tensor = context>input(0);
OP_REQUIRES(context, TensorShapeUtils::IsVector(input_tensor.shape()),
errors::InvalidArgument("ZeroOut expects a 1D vector."));
// ...
}
This asserts that the input is a vector, and returns having set the
InvalidArgument
status if it isn't. The
OP_REQUIRES
macro takes three arguments:
 The
context
, which can either be anOpKernelContext
orOpKernelConstruction
pointer (seetensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h
), for itsSetStatus()
method.  The condition. For example, there are functions for validating the shape
of a tensor in
tensorflow/core/framework/tensor_shape.h
 The error itself, which is represented by a
Status
object, seetensorflow/core/lib/core/status.h
. AStatus
has both a type (frequentlyInvalidArgument
, but see the list of types) and a message. Functions for constructing an error may be found intensorflow/core/lib/core/errors.h
.
Alternatively, if you want to test whether a Status
object returned from some
function is an error, and if so return it, use
OP_REQUIRES_OK
. Both of these macros return from the
function on error.
Op registration
Attrs
Ops can have attrs, whose values are set when the op is added to a graph. These are used to configure the op, and their values can be accessed both within the kernel implementation and in the types of inputs and outputs in the op registration. Prefer using an input instead of an attr when possible, since inputs are more flexible. This is because attrs are constants and must be defined at graph construction time. In contrast, inputs are Tensors whose values can be dynamic; that is, inputs can change every step, be set using a feed, etc. Attrs are used for things that can't be done with inputs: any configuration that affects the signature (number or type of inputs or outputs) or that can't change from steptostep.
You define an attr when you register the op, by specifying its name and type
using the Attr
method, which expects a spec of the form:
<name>: <attrtypeexpr>
where <name>
begins with a letter and can be composed of alphanumeric
characters and underscores, and <attrtypeexpr>
is a type expression of the
form described below.
For example, if you'd like the ZeroOut
op to preserve a userspecified index,
instead of only the 0th element, you can register the op like so:
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Attr("preserve_index: int")
.Input("to_zero: int32")
.Output("zeroed: int32");
(Note that the set of attribute types is different from the tensor types used for inputs and outputs.)
Your kernel can then access this attr in its constructor via the context
parameter:
class ZeroOutOp : public OpKernel {
public:
explicit ZeroOutOp(OpKernelConstruction* context) : OpKernel(context) {
// Get the index of the value to preserve
OP_REQUIRES_OK(context,
context>GetAttr("preserve_index", &preserve_index_));
// Check that preserve_index is positive
OP_REQUIRES(context, preserve_index_ >= 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Need preserve_index >= 0, got ",
preserve_index_));
}
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// ...
}
private:
int preserve_index_;
};
which can then be used in the Compute
method:
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// ...
// We're using saved attr to validate potentially dynamic input
// So we check that preserve_index is in range
OP_REQUIRES(context, preserve_index_ < input.dimension(0),
errors::InvalidArgument("preserve_index out of range"));
// Set all the elements of the output tensor to 0
const int N = input.size();
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
output_flat(i) = 0;
}
// Preserve the requested input value
output_flat(preserve_index_) = input(preserve_index_);
}
Attr types
The following types are supported in an attr:
string
: Any sequence of bytes (not required to be UTF8).int
: A signed integer.float
: A floating point number.bool
: True or false.type
: One of the (nonref) values ofDataType
.shape
: ATensorShapeProto
.tensor
: ATensorProto
.list(<type>)
: A list of<type>
, where<type>
is one of the above types. Note thatlist(list(<type>))
is invalid.
See also: op_def_builder.cc:FinalizeAttr
for a definitive list.
Default values & constraints
Attrs may have default values, and some types of attrs can have constraints. To
define an attr with constraints, you can use the following <attrtypeexpr>
s:
{'<string1>', '<string2>'}
: The value must be a string that has either the value<string1>
or<string2>
. The name of the type,string
, is implied when you use this syntax. This emulates an enum:
REGISTER_OP("EnumExample") .Attr("e: {'apple', 'orange'}");
{<type1>, <type2>}
: The value is of typetype
, and must be one of<type1>
or<type2>
, where<type1>
and<type2>
are supported tensor types. You don't specify that the type of the attr istype
. This is implied when you have a list of types in{...}
. For example, in this case the attrt
is a type that must be anint32
, afloat
, or abool
:
REGISTER_OP("RestrictedTypeExample") .Attr("t: {int32, float, bool}");

There are shortcuts for common type constraints:
numbertype
: Typetype
restricted to the numeric (nonstring and nonbool) types.realnumbertype
: Likenumbertype
without complex types.quantizedtype
: Likenumbertype
but just the quantized number types.
The specific lists of types allowed by these are defined by the functions (like
NumberTypes()
) intensorflow/core/framework/types.h
. In this example the attrt
must be one of the numeric types:c++ REGISTER_OP("NumberType") .Attr("t: numbertype");
For this op:
python tf.number_type(t=tf.int32) # Valid tf.number_type(t=tf.bool) # Invalid
Lists can be combined with other lists and single types. The following op allows attr
t
to be any of the numberic types, or the bool type:c++ REGISTER_OP("NumberOrBooleanType") .Attr("t: {numbertype, bool}");
For this op:
python tf.number_or_boolean_type(t=tf.int32) # Valid tf.number_or_boolean_type(t=tf.bool) # Valid tf.number_or_boolean_type(t=tf.string) # Invalid

int >= <n>
: The value must be an int whose value is greater than or equal to<n>
, where<n>
is a natural number.
For example, the following op registration specifies that the attr a
must
have a value that is at least 2
:
REGISTER_OP("MinIntExample") .Attr("a: int >= 2");
list(<type>) >= <n>
: A list of type<type>
whose length is greater than or equal to<n>
.
For example, the following op registration specifies that the attr a
is a
list of types (either int32
or float
), and that there must be at least 3
of them:
REGISTER_OP("TypeListExample") .Attr("a: list({int32, float}) >= 3");
To set a default value for an attr (making it optional in the generated code),
add = <default>
to the end, as in:
REGISTER_OP("AttrDefaultExample")
.Attr("i: int = 0");
The supported syntax of the default value is what would be used in the proto representation of the resulting GraphDef definition.
Here are examples for how to specify a default for all types:
REGISTER_OP("AttrDefaultExampleForAllTypes")
.Attr("s: string = 'foo'")
.Attr("i: int = 0")
.Attr("f: float = 1.0")
.Attr("b: bool = true")
.Attr("ty: type = DT_INT32")
.Attr("sh: shape = { dim { size: 1 } dim { size: 2 } }")
.Attr("te: tensor = { dtype: DT_INT32 int_val: 5 }")
.Attr("l_empty: list(int) = []")
.Attr("l_int: list(int) = [2, 3, 5, 7]");
Note in particular that the values of type type
use the DT_*
names for the types.
Polymorphism
Type Polymorphism
For ops that can take different types as input or produce different output
types, you can specify an attr in
an input or output type in the op registration. Typically
you would then register an OpKernel
for each supported type.
For instance, if you'd like the ZeroOut
op to work on float
s
in addition to int32
s, your op registration might look like:
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Attr("T: {float, int32}")
.Input("to_zero: T")
.Output("zeroed: T");
Your op registration now specifies that the input's type must be float
, or
int32
, and that its output will be the same type, since both have type T
.
A note on naming: Inputs, outputs, and attrs generally should be given snake_case names. The one exception is attrs that are used as the type of an input or in the type of an input. Those attrs can be inferred when the op is added to the graph and so don't appear in the op's function. For example, this last definition of ZeroOut will generate a Python function that looks like:
def zero_out(to_zero, name=None): """... Args: to_zero: A `Tensor`. Must be one of the following types: `float32`, `int32`. name: A name for the operation (optional). Returns: A `Tensor`. Has the same type as `to_zero`. """
If
to_zero
is passed anint32
tensor, thenT
is automatically set toint32
(well, actuallyDT_INT32
). Those inferred attrs are given Capitalized or CamelCase names.Compare this with an op that has a type attr that determines the output type:
REGISTER_OP("StringToNumber") .Input("string_tensor: string") .Output("output: out_type") .Attr("out_type: {float, int32} = DT_FLOAT"); .Doc(R"doc( Converts each string in the input Tensor to the specified numeric type. )doc");
In this case, the user has to specify the output type, as in the generated Python:
def string_to_number(string_tensor, out_type=None, name=None): """Converts each string in the input Tensor to the specified numeric type. Args: string_tensor: A `Tensor` of type `string`. out_type: An optional `tf.DType` from: `tf.float32, tf.int32`. Defaults to `tf.float32`. name: A name for the operation (optional). Returns: A `Tensor` of type `out_type`. """
\#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h"
class ZeroOutInt32Op : public OpKernel {
// as before
};
class ZeroOutFloatOp : public OpKernel {
public:
explicit ZeroOutFloatOp(OpKernelConstruction\* context)
: OpKernel(context) {}
void Compute(OpKernelContext\* context) override {
// Grab the input tensor
const Tensor& input\_tensor = context>input(0);
auto input = input\_tensor.flat<float>();
// Create an output tensor
Tensor* output = NULL;
OP\_REQUIRES\_OK(context,
context>allocate\_output(0, input_tensor.shape(), &output));
auto output\_flat = output>template flat<float>();
// Set all the elements of the output tensor to 0
const int N = input.size();
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
output\_flat(i) = 0;
}
// Preserve the first input value
if (N > 0) output\_flat(0) = input(0);
}
};
// Note that TypeConstraint<int32>("T") means that attr "T" (defined
// in the op registration above) must be "int32" to use this template
// instantiation.
REGISTER\_KERNEL\_BUILDER(
Name("ZeroOut")
.Device(DEVICE\_CPU)
.TypeConstraint<int32>("T"),
ZeroOutOpInt32);
REGISTER\_KERNEL\_BUILDER(
Name("ZeroOut")
.Device(DEVICE\_CPU)
.TypeConstraint<float>("T"),
ZeroOutFloatOp);
To preserve backwards compatibility, you should specify a default value when adding an attr to an existing op:
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut") .Attr("T: {float, int32} = DT_INT32") .Input("to_zero: T") .Output("zeroed: T")
Let's say you wanted to add more types, say double
:
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Attr("T: {float, double, int32}")
.Input("to_zero: T")
.Output("zeroed: T");
Instead of writing another OpKernel
with redundant code as above, often you
will be able to use a C++ template instead. You will still have one kernel
registration (REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER
call) per overload.
template <typename T>
class ZeroOutOp : public OpKernel {
public:
explicit ZeroOutOp(OpKernelConstruction* context) : OpKernel(context) {}
void Compute(OpKernelContext* context) override {
// Grab the input tensor
const Tensor& input_tensor = context>input(0);
auto input = input_tensor.flat<T>();
// Create an output tensor
Tensor* output = NULL;
OP_REQUIRES_OK(context,
context>allocate_output(0, input_tensor.shape(), &output));
auto output_flat = output>template flat<T>();
// Set all the elements of the output tensor to 0
const int N = input.size();
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
output_flat(i) = 0;
}
// Preserve the first input value
if (N > 0) output_flat(0) = input(0);
}
};
// Note that TypeConstraint<int32>("T") means that attr "T" (defined
// in the op registration above) must be "int32" to use this template
// instantiation.
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER(
Name("ZeroOut")
.Device(DEVICE_CPU)
.TypeConstraint<int32>("T"),
ZeroOutOp<int32>);
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER(
Name("ZeroOut")
.Device(DEVICE_CPU)
.TypeConstraint<float>("T"),
ZeroOutOp<float>);
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER(
Name("ZeroOut")
.Device(DEVICE_CPU)
.TypeConstraint<double>("T"),
ZeroOutOp<double>);
If you have more than a couple overloads, you can put the registration in a macro.
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h"
#define REGISTER_KERNEL(type) \
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER( \
Name("ZeroOut").Device(DEVICE_CPU).TypeConstraint<type>("T"), \
ZeroOutOp<type>)
REGISTER_KERNEL(int32);
REGISTER_KERNEL(float);
REGISTER_KERNEL(double);
#undef REGISTER_KERNEL
Depending on the list of types you are registering the kernel for, you may be
able to use a macro provided by
tensorflow/core/framework/register_types.h
:
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/op_kernel.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/framework/register_types.h"
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Attr("T: realnumbertype")
.Input("to_zero: T")
.Output("zeroed: T");
template <typename T>
class ZeroOutOp : public OpKernel { ... };
#define REGISTER_KERNEL(type) \
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER( \
Name("ZeroOut").Device(DEVICE_CPU).TypeConstraint<type>("T"), \
ZeroOutOp<type>)
TF_CALL_REAL_NUMBER_TYPES(REGISTER_KERNEL);
#undef REGISTER_KERNEL
List Inputs and Outputs
In addition to being able to accept or produce different types, ops can consume or produce a variable number of tensors.
In the next example, the attr T
holds a list of types, and is used as the
type of both the input in
and the output out
. The input and output are
lists of tensors of that type (and the number and types of tensors in the output
are the same as the input, since both have type T
).
REGISTER_OP("PolymorphicListExample")
.Attr("T: list(type)")
.Input("in: T")
.Output("out: T");
You can also place restrictions on what types can be specified in the list. In
this next case, the input is a list of float
and double
tensors. The op
accepts, for example, input types (float, double, float)
and in that case the
output type would also be (float, double, float)
.
REGISTER_OP("ListTypeRestrictionExample")
.Attr("T: list({float, double})")
.Input("in: T")
.Output("out: T");
If you want all the tensors in a list to be of the same type, you might do something like:
REGISTER_OP("IntListInputExample")
.Attr("N: int")
.Input("in: N * int32")
.Output("out: int32");
This accepts a list of int32
tensors, and uses an int
attr N
to
specify the length of the list.
This can be made type polymorphic as well. In the next
example, the input is a list of tensors (with length "N"
) of the same (but
unspecified) type ("T"
), and the output is a single tensor of matching type:
REGISTER_OP("SameListInputExample")
.Attr("N: int")
.Attr("T: type")
.Input("in: N * T")
.Output("out: T");
By default, tensor lists have a minimum length of 1. You can change that default
using
a ">="
constraint on the corresponding attr.
In this next example, the input is a list of at least 2 int32
tensors:
REGISTER_OP("MinLengthIntListExample")
.Attr("N: int >= 2")
.Input("in: N * int32")
.Output("out: int32");
The same syntax works with "list(type)"
attrs:
REGISTER_OP("MinimumLengthPolymorphicListExample")
.Attr("T: list(type) >= 3")
.Input("in: T")
.Output("out: T");
Inputs and Outputs
To summarize the above, an op registration can have multiple inputs and outputs:
REGISTER_OP("MultipleInsAndOuts")
.Input("y: int32")
.Input("z: float")
.Output("a: string")
.Output("b: int32");
Each input or output spec is of the form:
<name>: <iotypeexpr>
where <name>
begins with a letter and can be composed of alphanumeric
characters and underscores. <iotypeexpr>
is one of the following type
expressions:
<type>
, where<type>
is a supported input type (e.g.float
,int32
,string
). This specifies a single tensor of the given type.
See the list of supported Tensor types.
REGISTER_OP("BuiltInTypesExample") .Input("integers: int32") .Input("complex_numbers: complex64");
<attrtype>
, where<attrtype>
is the name of an Attr with typetype
orlist(type)
(with a possible type restriction). This syntax allows for polymorphic ops.
REGISTER_OP("PolymorphicSingleInput") .Attr("T: type") .Input("in: T"); REGISTER_OP("RestrictedPolymorphicSingleInput") .Attr("T: {int32, int64}") .Input("in: T");
Referencing an attr of type list(type)
allows you to accept a sequence of
tensors.
REGISTER_OP("ArbitraryTensorSequenceExample") .Attr("T: list(type)") .Input("in: T") .Output("out: T"); REGISTER_OP("RestrictedTensorSequenceExample") .Attr("T: list({int32, int64})") .Input("in: T") .Output("out: T");
Note that the number and types of tensors in the output out
is the same as
in the input in
, since both are of type T
.
 For a sequence of tensors with the same type:
<number> * <type>
, where<number>
is the name of an Attr with typeint
. The<type>
can either be a specific type likeint32
orfloat
, or the name of an attr with typetype
. As an example of the first, this op accepts a list ofint32
tensors:
REGISTER_OP("Int32SequenceExample") .Attr("NumTensors: int") .Input("in: NumTensors * int32")
Whereas this op accepts a list of tensors of any type, as long as they are all the same:
REGISTER_OP("SameTypeSequenceExample") .Attr("NumTensors: int") .Attr("T: type") .Input("in: NumTensors * T")
 For a reference to a tensor:
Ref(<type>)
, where<type>
is one of the previous types.
A note on naming: Any attr used in the type of an input will be inferred. By convention those inferred attrs use capital names (like
T
orN
). Otherwise inputs, outputs, and attrs have names like function parameters (e.g.num_outputs
). For more details, see the earlier note on naming.
For more details, see
tensorflow/core/framework/op_def_builder.h
.
Backwards compatibility
Let's assume you have written a nice, custom op and shared it with others, so you have happy customers using your operation. However, you'd like to make changes to the op in some way.
In general, changes to existing, checkedin specifications must be
backwardscompatible: changing the specification of an op must not break prior
serialized GraphDef
protocol buffers constructed from older specifications.
The details of GraphDef
compatibility are
described here.
There are several ways to preserve backwardscompatibility.

Any new attrs added to an operation must have default values defined, and with that default value the op must have the original behavior. To change an operation from not polymorphic to polymorphic, you must give a default value to the new type attr to preserve the original signature by default. For example, if your operation was:
REGISTER_OP("MyGeneralUnaryOp") .Input("in: float") .Output("out: float");
you can make it polymorphic in a backwardscompatible way using:
REGISTER_OP("MyGeneralUnaryOp")
.Input("in: T")
.Output("out: T")
.Attr("T: numerictype = DT_FLOAT");

You can safely make a constraint on an attr less restrictive. For example, you can change from
{int32, int64}
to{int32, int64, float}
ortype
. Or you may change from{"apple", "orange"}
to{"apple", "banana", "orange"}
orstring
. 
You can change single inputs / outputs into list inputs / outputs, as long as the default for the list type matches the old signature.

You can add a new list input / output, if it defaults to empty.

Namespace any new ops you create, by prefixing the op names with something unique to your project. This avoids having your op colliding with any ops that might be included in future versions of TensorFlow.

Plan ahead! Try to anticipate future uses for the op. Some signature changes can't be done in a compatible way (for example, making a list of the same type into a list of varying types).
The full list of safe and unsafe changes can be found in
tensorflow/core/framework/op_compatibility_test.cc
.
If you cannot make your change to an operation backwards compatible, then create
a new operation with a new name with the new semantics.
Also note that while these changes can maintain GraphDef
compatibility, the
generated Python code may change in a way that isn't compatible with old
callers. The Python API may be kept compatible by careful changes in a
handwritten Python wrapper, by keeping the old signature except possibly adding
new optional arguments to the end. Generally incompatible changes may only be
made when TensorFlow's changes major versions, and must conform to the
GraphDef
version semantics.
GPU Support
You can implement different OpKernels and register one for CPU and another for
GPU, just like you can register kernels for different types.
There are several examples of kernels with GPU support in
tensorflow/core/kernels/
.
Notice some kernels have a CPU version in a .cc
file, a GPU version in a file
ending in _gpu.cu.cc
, and some code shared in common in a .h
file.
For example, the tf.pad
has
everything but the GPU kernel in tensorflow/core/kernels/pad_op.cc
.
The GPU kernel is in
tensorflow/core/kernels/pad_op_gpu.cu.cc
,
and the shared code is a templated class defined in
tensorflow/core/kernels/pad_op.h
.
We organize the code this way for two reasons: it allows you to share common
code among the CPU and GPU implementations, and it puts the GPU implementation
into a separate file so that it can be compiled only by the GPU compiler.
One thing to note, even when the GPU kernel version of pad
is used, it still
needs its "paddings"
input in CPU memory. To mark that inputs or outputs are
kept on the CPU, add a HostMemory()
call to the kernel registration, e.g.:
#define REGISTER_GPU_KERNEL(T) \
REGISTER_KERNEL_BUILDER(Name("Pad") \
.Device(DEVICE_GPU) \
.TypeConstraint<T>("T") \
.HostMemory("paddings"), \
PadOp<GPUDevice, T>)
Compiling the kernel for the GPU device
Look at
cuda_op_kernel.cu.cc
for an example that uses a CUDA kernel to implement an op. The
tf_custom_op_library
accepts a gpu_srcs
argument in which the list of source
files containing the CUDA kernels (*.cu.cc
files) can be specified. For use
with a binary installation of TensorFlow, the CUDA kernels have to be compiled
with NVIDIA's nvcc
compiler. Here is the sequence of commands you can use to
compile the
cuda_op_kernel.cu.cc
and
cuda_op_kernel.cc
into a single dynamically loadable library:
nvcc std=c++11 c o cuda_op_kernel.cu.o cuda_op_kernel.cu.cc \
I $TF_INC I$TF_INC/external/nsync/public D GOOGLE_CUDA=1 x cu Xcompiler fPIC
g++ std=c++11 shared o cuda_op_kernel.so cuda_op_kernel.cc \
cuda_op_kernel.cu.o I $TF_INC I$TF_INC/external/nsync/public fPIC lcudart L$TF_LIB ltensorflow_framework
cuda_op_kernel.so
produced above can be loaded as usual in Python, using the
tf.load_op_library
function.
Note that if your CUDA libraries are not installed in /usr/local/lib64
,
you'll need to specify the path explicitly in the second (g++) command above.
For example, add L /usr/local/cuda8.0/lib64/
if your CUDA is installed in
/usr/local/cuda8.0
.
Note in some linux settings, additional options to
nvcc
compiling step are needed. AddD_MWAITXINTRIN_H_INCLUDED
to thenvcc
command line to avoid errors frommwaitxintrin.h
.
Implement the gradient in Python
Given a graph of ops, TensorFlow uses automatic differentiation (backpropagation) to add new ops representing gradients with respect to the existing ops (see Gradient Computation). To make automatic differentiation work for new ops, you must register a gradient function which computes gradients with respect to the ops' inputs given gradients with respect to the ops' outputs.
Mathematically, if an op computes \(y = f(x)\) the registered gradient op converts gradients \(\partial L/ \partial y\) of loss \(L\) with respect to \(y\) into gradients \(\partial L/ \partial x\) with respect to \(x\) via the chain rule:
In the case of ZeroOut
, only one entry in the input affects the output, so the
gradient with respect to the input is a sparse "one hot" tensor. This is
expressed as follows:
from tensorflow.python.framework import ops
from tensorflow.python.ops import array_ops
from tensorflow.python.ops import sparse_ops
@ops.RegisterGradient("ZeroOut")
def _zero_out_grad(op, grad):
"""The gradients for `zero_out`.
Args:
op: The `zero_out` `Operation` that we are differentiating, which we can use
to find the inputs and outputs of the original op.
grad: Gradient with respect to the output of the `zero_out` op.
Returns:
Gradients with respect to the input of `zero_out`.
"""
to_zero = op.inputs[0]
shape = array_ops.shape(to_zero)
index = array_ops.zeros_like(shape)
first_grad = array_ops.reshape(grad, [1])[0]
to_zero_grad = sparse_ops.sparse_to_dense([index], shape, first_grad, 0)
return [to_zero_grad] # List of one Tensor, since we have one input
Details about registering gradient functions with
tf.RegisterGradient
:

For an op with one output, the gradient function will take an
tf.Operation
op
and atf.Tensor
grad
and build new ops out of the tensorsop.inputs[i]
,op.outputs[i]
, andgrad
. Information about any attrs can be found viatf.Operation.get_attr
. 
If the op has multiple outputs, the gradient function will take
op
andgrads
, wheregrads
is a list of gradients with respect to each output. The result of the gradient function must be a list ofTensor
objects representing the gradients with respect to each input. 
If there is no welldefined gradient for some input, such as for integer inputs used as indices, the corresponding returned gradient should be
None
. For example, for an op taking a floating point tensorx
and an integer indexi
, the gradient function wouldreturn [x_grad, None]
. 
If there is no meaningful gradient for the op at all, you often will not have to register any gradient, and as long as the op's gradient is never needed, you will be fine. In some cases, an op has no welldefined gradient but can be involved in the computation of the gradient. Here you can use
ops.NotDifferentiable
to automatically propagate zeros backwards.
Note that at the time the gradient function is called, only the data flow graph of ops is available, not the tensor data itself. Thus, all computation must be performed using other tensorflow ops, to be run at graph execution time.
Shape functions in C++
The TensorFlow API has a feature called "shape inference" that provides
information about the shapes of tensors without having to execute the
graph. Shape inference is supported by "shape functions" that are registered for
each op type in the C++ REGISTER_OP
declaration, and perform two roles:
asserting that the shapes of the inputs are compatible during graph
construction, and specifying the shapes for the outputs.
Shape functions are defined as operations on the
shape_inference::InferenceContext
class. For example, in the shape function
for ZeroOut:
.SetShapeFn([](::tensorflow::shape_inference::InferenceContext* c) {
c>set_output(0, c>input(0));
return Status::OK();
});
c>set_output(0, c>input(0));
declares that the first output's shape should
be set to the first input's shape. If the output is selected by its index as in the above example, the second parameter of set_output
should be a ShapeHandle
object. You can create an empty ShapeHandle
object by its default constructor. The ShapeHandle
object for an input with index idx
can be obtained by c>input(idx)
.
There are a number of common shape functions
that apply to many ops, such as shape_inference::UnchangedShape
which can be
found in common_shape_fns.h and used as follows:
REGISTER_OP("ZeroOut")
.Input("to_zero: int32")
.Output("zeroed: int32")
.SetShapeFn(::tensorflow::shape_inference::UnchangedShape);
A shape function can also constrain the shape of an input. For the version of
ZeroOut
with a vector shape constraint, the shape function
would be as follows:
.SetShapeFn([](::tensorflow::shape_inference::InferenceContext* c) {
::tensorflow::shape_inference::ShapeHandle input;
TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(c>WithRank(c>input(0), 1, &input));
c>set_output(0, input);
return Status::OK();
});
The WithRank
call validates that the input shape c>input(0)
has
a shape with exactly one dimension (or if the input shape is unknown,
the output shape will be a vector with one unknown dimension).
If your op is polymorphic with multiple inputs, you can use
members of InferenceContext
to determine the number of shapes to check, and
Merge
to validate that the shapes are all compatible (alternatively, access
attributes that indicate the lengths, with InferenceContext::GetAttr
, which
provides access to the attributes of the op).
.SetShapeFn([](::tensorflow::shape_inference::InferenceContext* c) {
::tensorflow::shape_inference::ShapeHandle input;
::tensorflow::shape_inference::ShapeHandle output;
for (size_t i = 0; i < c>num_inputs(); ++i) {
TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(c>WithRank(c>input(i), 2, &input));
TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(c>Merge(output, input, &output));
}
c>set_output(0, output);
return Status::OK();
});
Since shape inference is an optional feature, and the shapes of tensors may vary
dynamically, shape functions must be robust to incomplete shape information for
any of the inputs. The Merge
method in InferenceContext
allows the caller to assert that two shapes are the same, even if either
or both of them do not have complete information. Shape functions are defined
for all of the core TensorFlow ops and provide many different usage examples.
The InferenceContext
class has a number of functions that can be used to
define shape function manipulations. For example, you can validate that a
particular dimension has a very specific value using InferenceContext::Dim
and
InferenceContext::WithValue
; you can specify that an output dimension is the
sum / product of two input dimensions using InferenceContext::Add
and
InferenceContext::Multiply
. See the InferenceContext
class for
all of the various shape manipulations you can specify. The following example sets
shape of the first output to (n, 3), where first input has shape (n, ...)
.SetShapeFn([](::tensorflow::shape_inference::InferenceContext* c) {
c>set_output(0, c>Matrix(c>Dim(c>input(0), 0), 3));
return Status::OK();
});
If you have a complicated shape function, you should consider adding a test for
validating that various input shape combinations produce the expected output
shape combinations. You can see examples of how to write these tests in some
our
core ops tests.
(The syntax of INFER_OK
and INFER_ERROR
are a little cryptic, but try to be
compact in representing input and output shape specifications in tests. For
now, see the surrounding comments in those tests to get a sense of the shape
string specification).